Developing the infrastructure for managing institutional research archives
Abstract
Abstract:
Purpose - Capturing research in modern academic institutions is of vital importance. A robust approach to systematically harvest, host, and update a university-wide repository is not only beneficial for the academics within the HEI, but it can also boost and promote the visibility of the University.
Design/methodology/approach - Although many decentralised approaches offer the possibility to showcase an individual's research, the vast and disparate sources cannot facilitate an institutional repository. Since research constitutes one of the main aims of a university, we follow a solution that records the whole research that occurs within an institution, which is VIVO. In this paper, we present the adaptation of VIVO by a Greek University, namely, the University of West Attica. In our approach, we have merged the existing systems and harvested research-related information from different sources on the web.
Findings - The proposed solution serves as an academic research repository. It provides consistency over the presented research outputs, making the research of the University wider visible.
Originality/value - The paper presents an ontology-based system for documenting the undertaken research within an institution. Moreover, it allows the personalisation of the ontology, thus making it possible to customise the repository to fit an institution's needs, the web interface, therefore presenting the perceived significant components for the University, and the information visualisation.
Keywords
References
Tsolakidis, A., Sgouropoulou, C., Papageorgiou, E., Terraz, O., & Miaoulis, G. (2013). Using Visual Representation for Decision Support in Institutional Research Evaluation. In Intelligent Computer Graphics 2012 (pp. 41-57). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31745-3.
Triperina, E., Sgouropoulou, C., Xydas, I., Terraz, O., & Miaoulis, G. (2015). Creating the context for exploiting linked open data in multidimensional academic ranking. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES), 3(3), 33-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v3i3.5023.
Anastasios, T., Sgouropoulou, C., Xydas, I., Terraz, O., & Miaoulis, G. (2011, September). Academic research policy-making and evaluation using graph visualisation. In Informatics (PCI), 2011 15th Panhellenic Conference on (pp. 28-32). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PCI.2011.38.
Zimmerman, E. (2002, August). CRIS-Cross: current research information systems at a crossroads. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel (pp. 11-20).
Koopmans, N. I. (2002). What's your question? The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups.
Conlon, M., & Corson-Rikert, J. (2012). VIVO: A Semantic Approach to Scholarly Networking and Discovery (Vol. 2). Morgan & Claypool Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00428ED1V01Y201207WEB002.
EuroCRIS, Current Research Information Systems, www.eurocris.org
Ebeling, B., Klages, M., & Breitner, M. H. (2011). IT-gestütztes Management von Drittmitteln im Rahmen des Forschungsmanagements an deutschen Hochschulen. Informatik.
Azeroual, O., & Abuosba, M. (2019). Improving the data quality in the research information systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.07388.
Bevan, S., & Harrington, J. (2011). Managing research publications: lessons learned from the implementation of a Current Research Information System. Serials, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1629/2426.
Zelepukhina, V. A., Danilova, T. S., Burmistrov, A. S., & Tarasevich, Y. Y. (2014). Particular experience in design and implementation of a Current Research Information System in Russia: national specificity. Procedia Computer Science, 33, 168-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.06.028.
Johansson, Å., & Ottosson, M. O. (2012). A national current research information system for Sweden.
Biesenbender, S., Petersohn, S., & Thiedig, C. (2019). Using Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) to showcase national and institutional research (potential): research information systems in the context of Open Science. Procedia Computer Science, 146, 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.089.
Scholze, F., & Maier, J. (2012). Establishing a research information system as part of an integrated approach to information management: Best practice at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). Liber Quarterly, 21(2), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.8019.
Dimou, A., De Vocht, L., Van Grootel, G., Van Campe, L., Latour, J., Mannens, E., & Van de Walle, R. (2014). Visualising the information of a linked open data enabled research information system. Procedia Computer Science, 33, 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.06.039.
Parinov, S., Lyapunov, V., Puzyrev, R., & Kogalovsky, M. (2015). Semantically enrichable research information system SocioNet. In Knowledge Engineering and Semantic Web: 6th International Conference, KESW 2015, Moscow, Russia, September 30-October 2, 2015, Proceedings 6 (pp. 147-157). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24543-0_11.
Cao, H., He, H., & Tian, J. (2022). A Scientific Research Information System via Intelligent Blockchain Technology for the Applications in University Management. Mobile Information Systems, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7512692.
Benmoussa, K., Laaziri, M., Khoulji, S., & Kerkeb, M. L. (2018). Intelligent system for the use of the scientific research information system. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.090619.
Benmoussa, K., Laaziri, M., Khoulji, S., Larbi, K. M., & El Yamami, A. (2019). Enhanced model for ergonomic evaluation of information systems: application to scientific research information system. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9(1), 683. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v9i1.pp683-694.
Asserson, A., Jeffery, K. G., & Lopatenko, A. (2002). CERIF: past, present and future: an overview.
Pinto, C. S., Simões, C., & Amaral, L. (2014). CERIF–Is the standard helping to improve CRIS?. Procedia Computer Science, 33, 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.06.013.
Parinov, S. (2014). Towards an open data on how the research data are used: CRIS-CERIF based approach. Procedia Computer Science, 33, 55-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.06.009.
Corson-Rikert, J., Mitchell, S., Lowe, B., Rejack, N., Ding, Y., & Guo, C. (2012). The VIVO ontology. In VIVO: A Semantic Approach to Scholarly Networking and Discovery (pp. 15-33). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79435-3_2.
Krafft, D. B., Cappadona, N. A., Caruso, B., Corson-Rikert, J., Devare, M., & Lowe, B. J. (2010, April). Vivo: Enabling national networking of scientists. InProceedings of the Web Science Conference (Vol. 2010, pp. 1310-1313).
Albert, P., Holmes, K. L., Borner, K., & Conlon, M. (2012, June). Research discovery through linked open data. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 429-430). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2232817.2232926.
DOI: 10.26265/jiim.v8i1.4515
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
